i dd perfect comp for lectures.
Saturday, April 29, 2006 by yish
that day during a lecture ann suddenly commented, "hey. i think the lecture is not really a lecture loh."
wat she meant was like it wasnt very interacting. we werent learning sth new coz the lecturer was mostly regurgitating the stuff on the notes. and it was like a story telling session. u noe, u have a bk in hand and someone reads it to u. (hey, that's kidsread!!) haiz. so we actually suggested an idea on the spot.
why dun we make lecture something which we can choose from. not we are appointed the lecturer but we choose a lecturer. like, at the same time we have 4 LTs with different lecturers lecturing the same subject. and we choose hu to go to. now sch's implementing this card thing which we have to tap to go into the LTs, we just tap at the LT we are going into lah.
it's like changing a monopoly into perfect competition market. it used to be monopoly coz we have to go to a lecturer. now there's consumer choice, by the price mechanism, we can actually bring the standard of goods higher and there wont be wastage. haha. becoz of the new competition, lecturers will like try to make lectures more interacting.
it will add burden to the lecturer lah. but then why dun we change it to one lecturer just have to lecture once for that topic that day (unlike now where lecturers have to repeat for a diff lecture grp). the reduced burden will cancel off the increase right?
but i doubt this will come true lah. coz the adults will think: kids will always be kids, they wont hold responsibility for their learning. right?
wat she meant was like it wasnt very interacting. we werent learning sth new coz the lecturer was mostly regurgitating the stuff on the notes. and it was like a story telling session. u noe, u have a bk in hand and someone reads it to u. (hey, that's kidsread!!) haiz. so we actually suggested an idea on the spot.
why dun we make lecture something which we can choose from. not we are appointed the lecturer but we choose a lecturer. like, at the same time we have 4 LTs with different lecturers lecturing the same subject. and we choose hu to go to. now sch's implementing this card thing which we have to tap to go into the LTs, we just tap at the LT we are going into lah.
it's like changing a monopoly into perfect competition market. it used to be monopoly coz we have to go to a lecturer. now there's consumer choice, by the price mechanism, we can actually bring the standard of goods higher and there wont be wastage. haha. becoz of the new competition, lecturers will like try to make lectures more interacting.
it will add burden to the lecturer lah. but then why dun we change it to one lecturer just have to lecture once for that topic that day (unlike now where lecturers have to repeat for a diff lecture grp). the reduced burden will cancel off the increase right?
but i doubt this will come true lah. coz the adults will think: kids will always be kids, they wont hold responsibility for their learning. right?